AI Review Weekly Show
Welcome to the AI review room.
Good afternoon, Mr.
Jawan Tucker.
How's everything going with you today?
All is going well, looking forward
for another exciting show, you
know, enjoy the extended weekend.
I will say that.
So how are things going?
Oh, just staying at
trouble as much as I can.
And we're excited about everything
that we will be talking about tonight.
We have some great information on,
you know, how are we going to adopt to
this new world of AI and not having.
The uneasiness of job loss.
Also, we will be talking about AI music.
It's a hot topic now these days.
And we're also going to talk about
how AI is advanced so much that
it has more human capabilities.
And then of course, we cannot have a show
without Elon Musk seems like these days.
And, uh, then we'll be talking about
gaming, president Biden and the
political process and everything.
Any words that you have, Juwan?
Now, I'm looking forward to
already get into the show, uh,
construction catering and food truck.
What's going on?
Fellas hope all as well.
Let's learn something.
We're looking to teach something.
So, you know, so I'm looking
forward to that as well.
Hope you enjoy the show.
Well, good, good, good, good.
Well, The first one is we're going to
talk about this particular individual.
He's um, he's, he's a big investment
banker, more in the China space,
but, um, his philosophy is, is that
50 percent of jobs could potentially
be lost in the next three years.
So let's listen to his
Job displacement, I think
we all know this is coming.
Um, you had said around 2017, you thought
in 10 to 15 years, about 40 to 50 percent
of all jobs would be replaced by AI.
Is that still an accurate
timeline in your opinion?
Um, what the heck is everyone
going to do when they don't have
a job in three years, if so?
It's actually uncannily accurate.
People have criticized me
for being too aggressive.
In the 2017, 18, 19, and I was a
little nervous at the time, but when
J, J and I came, came out, I think
everybody's on the bandwagon and
believing that is the correct pace.
Um, and I think the white job
collar jobs will go a lot faster.
Blue collar job, maybe a little slower
because more people are shifting
to the software only displacement.
And, and I think it's a very,
very significant problem.
I think finally some governments
are waking up and realize they
have to do something about this.
And in my AI 2041, I
outlined a number of, um, so
what's your first thoughts on that?
Um, I agree with him and I, I don't think
he's been overly aggressive, you know?
So I guess back in 2016, 2017,
I may have have challenged him
a little, but, um, A lot of
progression has been made since then.
And I see a lot of those white collar
jobs being taken off the board up front.
Blue collar, you got a little more time.
And it's not, he's not
the only one saying that.
It's everyone talking about it now.
We, we had segments with, with
Mark Cuban where he's saying that
Elon Musk, I mean, you have all
of these influencers that are now.
Seeing the impact this technology
can have on, on their businesses.
And so, um, I agree with them.
Yeah.
And one thing I noticed about these themes
is that it's really companies are, are
the ones that's going to drive this.
It's not going to be coming from the
federal government or state governments
that for operational efficiencies.
They're being very quiet about how they're
going to deploy this technology and
they might be talking about how they're
putting AI in their particular products,
but they're sort of being very coy about
how they will implement it for internal
purposes within the organization itself.
Yeah, I see that.
I mean, it's happening happening now.
I don't know about at your
job, but at my company.
Mike, we use Microsoft three 60.
And so now we have, um, co pilot as, as
the preferred AI for us to use in house.
And, um, you know, it, it,
it doesn't make a difference.
It's helping to craft emails, at least
the first crack at a lot of these emails.
But, um, yeah, it's, it's happening and
it's going to be on the organization,
especially until there's, without there
being any regulations in place right now.
Um, it's going to be, uh, I
think a fast process, though.
I think, I think once it catches
on, it's going to catch, it's going
to set, set off like a wildfire.
Absolutely.
Well, we'll go listen to the rest of this.
And I think it's interesting how he
has conversation about the future
with, uh, your kids and everything.
So let's finish up.
Creative, maybe not
necessarily workable solutions.
That will, that was intended
to get people thinking.
So get a copy of the book.
Um, well, uh, so we've got a lot ahead.
Somehow we're out of time and
we need to let these people eat.
But the one question I do want
to leave everybody with is,
can we get some hope here?
Um, how should we prepare our
kids to live alongside machines?
Um, if this is what's coming and
it's coming fast, you know, let
alone all of our jobs, we need to be
thinking about how to work this in
and help employees and help everybody.
What do we do for our kids when they
say, what should I be when I grow up?
Yeah, I think first thing we all have
to do and influence all the people
around us is to stop this nonsense
about kids are using Chat GPT to cheat.
Right, this is not cheating any
more than using Word or Photoshop.
The kids, when they go into the
workplace are going to be measured
based on the final output of their work.
They're not going to be measured
on what did you use Chat GPT,
did you use Google Search?
So, I think we need to do something.
people to harness AI and use
all the tools so that they can
be the best that they can be.
I thought that was really good advice is
that we're all measured by our output.
And I never really thought about
that, but it's true that we, you
know, especially in our profession
of sales, we definitely measured on
that, but everybody's job is for sure.
What kind of output are you providing?
And is your output could be
potentially be replaced by AI.
It's results oriented, you know,
what, what, what's the results.
I had that conversation with.
My, um, my youngest this week, you
know, and I was, she was in the, in my
room doing some work on her computer.
And she was like, dad,
can you help me with this?
Dad, what does this mean?
I would like just use chat GPT
or perplexity or one of those
models and it can help you.
And she was like, my friends use that.
I don't like using it.
And I'm like, why not?
And she said, it's cheating.
I said, no, it's not cheating.
And I said, and to be quite frank, you
need to learn it and know more about it
than your friends know about it, because
it's going to be a big part of your
future, you know, and so those are the
conversations that we have to start having
with our kids leverage this technology.
Don't go with what society is saying right
now, um, be an innovator, think ahead
and say, I need to know this, um, to,
to the best of my ability, because this
is going to potentially set me apart.
Yeah, I totally agree and it's something
that is makes life so much easier and
it's made me think of a little bit more
creatively things that I might have
never thought about is giving me new
ideas to produce better content and
better outcomes for, you know, my job,
but also what AI review room itself.
Exactly.
Okay.
We are actually going to, I said of
just typing out the prompt, I said, I'm
going to actually ask chat GPT sort of
the list of their 20 jobs that chat GPT.
it wrong, but I didn't recognize it.
That did place humans
within to a table format.
Ordered by probability columns by rank
job and why better than human probability.
So the job is, is a listing of
jobs that chat gbt could replace.
And so it came up with these top 20.
We won't go through all of them, but
we'll just go through a couple of them.
The first one is data entry.
He said probability 95%.
I can see that.
And, and, and before we go any
further, I want the community to, to
really hone in on this because a lot
of us may be in these professions,
these may be our day to days.
And so, so get a firm understanding
of the probability of your
position being eliminated by AI.
So.
Very good catch.
A telemarketer customer service rep,
you know, now with a bot, um, you can
do 24, seven, the bot can work 24,
seven and not have to worry about it.
It
doesn't call out.
It's not going to
call out.
It's not going to get sick.
Doesn't need any sick days.
And so you have to start thinking
along those lines as well.
Proofreader transcriptionists
come that for sure.
I'm surprised that's not a hundred
percent, uh, technical support.
Um, yeah, 80 percent copywriter, uh,
and then market research analysts.
I, that, I, that is definitely going away.
Paralegal, interesting travel agent.
I thought travel agents would
be a little higher than that.
Receptionist.
You remember all of our, uh,
different types of software.
We saw that you could have a
computer, basically avatar and shit.
When you show up, it will
know you can listen to it.
Talk back and forth online tutor.
I'm surprised after this
is not a hundred percent,
uh, social media, medical scribe, HR
assistant, content moderator, sales reps.
Oh, We've got 48 percent
chance of us getting replaced.
Oh, that's pretty high.
That's pretty high.
Oh my gosh.
All right.
And research assistant.
You know, I found that one kind
of interesting there for sure.
Okay.
Our next one is here is basically
the opposite of it is what jobs
that AI could not potentially
replace and the probability of that.
And the first one was psychotherapist
that chat GPT came up with.
What do you think about that?
It's interesting because, you know,
I mean, a lot of these companions
nowadays, it's, it's something that
they can talk with, you know, without
having to pay those descriptions
or even, I think you demoed.
If I'm not mistaken, you demoed an
application to where as you can get
that consultation and talk with, um,
your doctors and things of that nature.
And so that's interesting that
that's number one on a list.
95%.
I thought it would have
a lower probability.
Yeah.
Social worker, uh,
creative director, nurse.
I agree with that.
I agree with creative director as
well, because creativity is upon us.
I mean, I go back to what one
of my friends said, creative.
We're now in a creative revolution.
You know, we went through
the industrial revolution.
Now we're at that creative stage.
And so chat GPT and all these other
chatbots is going to allow us to.
Expand our creativity nurse.
I'm glad to see that.
So I can tell my wife, you can rest
assured now that that, you know, so
even if I lose my job as a sales rep
now and I can live off my wife, so,
and chat GPT does not lie as we know,
no hallucinations here.
No hallucination at all.
So just tell her that, you know,
she could do a double shift.
Then exactly, exactly.
And I kick my feet up
primary school teacher.
Uh, I, I feeling that's going to, uh,
I could see where that could, cause you
can't find people that want to teach kids.
I can see where there's
some automation in that one.
I can see that as well.
Uh, a judge, uh, a CEO.
Well, I know quite a
few CEOs are pretty bad.
I would think Chad GPT
could do a better job.
Some of these CEOs.
This is the face
of the company.
You still need a face.
Yeah, but you could create a, you
could create one that everybody likes.
Oh my gosh.
Oh, oh my, uh, police officer.
Yeah.
I don't think we have Robo.
Kai.
I won't have RoboCop, but you know,
I think we've That, that episode,
well, that, that news article to
where I rise in Pittsburgh, they
had reduced their staff force, their
police force and had them working.
The, I mean, based off of their
analytics, we just had them work.
They had them work doing the
highest crop bomb volume periods.
Couldn't get that out, but yeah.
So, but yeah, so I don't know, is
there any way they can automate that?
Mm-Hmm.
Firefighter.
I could see that one for sure.
I, I, I mean, I don't say you automate,
you know, firefighter surgeon, a surgeon.
Well, there's, uh, intuitive,
but, you know, surgeon is, um,
actually running the robot itself.
But yeah, I could see that one artist.
I don't know about that one.
That falls under creativity.
I don't see actors.
And politician, you know, how would
you like to have an AI politician?
Um, well, they already started
with AI commencement speeches.
So, so what's next?
Well, I didn't see in here minister or
you remember we had conversation last
week, you know, the minister's not there.
So it looks like that one could be,
you know, One of the lists on the list
could be replaced there for each one.
Now, now, would you show up?
Oh, that's a different,
that's a different thing.
Uh, chef.
Uh, yeah, I could see that one actor.
I don't know about that.
I can see that one sports coach.
Yeah.
Well, I say let's revisit this, let's
say in another six months and see.
Yeah, that's a great idea.
And check out the
probabilities because it's an.
It's forever changing.
This is a living document right here.
I
really, I really think that, um, as
time progresses, we're going to see
these occupations change as well.
Journalists.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
And I really liked it.
The Bible says based on the human needs
and skills, emotional, intelligent
and physical presence, AI currently
cannot replicate effectively.
I like that you put those
disclaimers in there.
I
mean, covering themselves,
covering the basis.
Okay.
That was a good
second.
That was a good second.
I liked that.
Good prompt.
Okay.
Well, our next one is going to
be, will I am AI impact on music.
So I'm going to do is start this
video and we'll make comments.
Okay.
Freeway is saying how, uh, Beanie, Beanie
Siegel is using AI to replace himself.
Okay.
Um,
His voice,
his voice.
Cause you know, beans
kind of lost his voice.
Like DLC was like DLC looking at
DLC said he's not going to do it.
Right.
He said he's on the fence.
Like he's, he's on the fence.
In this case, this was the first
time I looked at AI like, Oh, okay.
This is something positive, right?
Because the one thing you could
hear being a single, you can still
hit his bars when you hear his new
shit, but his voice is not the same.
Is that something that you think is,
is, is, is the, is a positive thing?
Like in the case of D.
O.
C.
In the case of, um,
being a seagull using A.
I.
If the if they own their
model, yes, that's dope.
All right.
But we're not there yet.
The artists currently right now,
that's what I'm trying to push for is
for the artists to own their model,
meaning your voice.
Yeah, the entire essence, whatever
creates it and like this stack, you need
artists need to own that their own model.
Wow.
So the own tuning specifically for
the, for the AI community, an artist
should own the tuning of their voice,
whatever that spectrum is, whatever that
instance is, the artist should own that.
And they should only one
should access their voice.
The moment an artist right now,
because there's no regulations, because
there's no governance, Does that,
and they don't truly, truly own it.
That brings up a whole lot of other things
like, uh, duping, you know, fake newsing,
because they're going to be using it in
ways that, you know, that means anybody
could go in there and type some shit.
And what if, and the, and the, and
the, and the instant itself does
not, is not trained and tuned around.
Specifics on, I would never say that.
So the AI that most people are using is
require somebody to go there and bus a
verse to the verse, and then they do new
age auto tune and they wrap it around the
sounding of somebody's voice, but it's.
All right, Juwan, give me
your first take on that.
It was amazing.
It's so much you can
talk about on this one.
Yeah, it doesn't go so many
different directions, but before
I jump into To what he was stating
what he was talking about less.
I want to make mention
of the artists first.
So being a seagull, you know, being a
seagull, part of the infamous Rockefeller
crew, um, you know, state property with,
um, in Philadelphia, that group, and
he, they stated that he lost his voice.
He, he had a very powerful voice.
I mean, very articulate with his
words and crafty with his words.
And so, um, um, They
stated he lost his voice.
Don't quote me on this from
getting shot, I'm going to say.
And then as a result of
that, um, it did some damage.
So his voice is very low.
It's different.
It's not the beanie secrets,
not the beans that I grew up to.
And, um, and then you have the DOC who
lost his voice and in a car accident.
And so both of those were very
promising and prominent artists,
um, of, of our, of their time.
And so now with them talking
about beans, being able to.
To use AI that can give him a second life.
When you look at it to me, it can,
because his creativity is still there.
We're just talking about
those jobs and creativity.
Um, his creativity is still there.
His mind hasn't changed
and you can still hear it.
Mean how crappy is with his
words, just in his interview.
And he did an interview as well
with, um, with dream champs.
And you, you can hear how low his
voice is on, on that, um, episode.
But, um, now back to will.
I am, I think will, I
am is on to something.
I don't know if.
How quickly they can get, get regulations
in place to where they can own their own
model, own their own voice, you know?
Um, so I'm curious to see how that
plays out, but he would know, he
mean, he's, he's now sponsoring,
wasn't he on a Google episode?
Um,
yeah,
so will I am he's, he's very
popular in this space recently,
a recent grad of, of Harvard.
He's very in tune with the industry
and he understands the backend
from his ghostwriting, the black
IPS and things of that nature.
So.
I really have taken, um, taking
an interest into his, his work as
a result of seeing this, um, this
segment of him talking about how
this technology could be leveraged.
My first thought is, is that
we need a studio like that.
That is one incredible studio.
We can sit there with their drink
and just, you know, chill out
and have a great conversation.
So, so, so that's what I'm saying
that we, we, we need to have a studio.
We can invest in that.
Um, You know, we're virtual.
You can have your office decked out.
I can have mine decked
out, you know, celebratory.
We need some celebratory shows as well.
We got a lot of major accomplishments
amongst ourselves, and then we
can do exactly what they're doing.
Take a drink to that.
We can drink to our accomplishments.
Oh my gosh.
Yeah, that was amazing.
It will have to do a show together,
uh, in the near future, uh, and
have a nice little, um, space there.
But you, him.
I am about the tech space and tech
stack, understanding all of that.
And how would you sort of say, um,
develop it and patent it or somehow
trademark it that you couldn't
use that sound that's similar to.
Will, will I am or any artists I, that
would be so hard for me to wrap my head
around that, to see how that would work.
I mean, it's difficult, it's difficult
to, um, to process, but I think it's
doable, you know, I mean, if he owns his
sound, he owns, um, he, he copyrights
his music, he owns his, his voice.
He, I mean, they use an auto tune and
things of that today, but now you can, um,
you can narrow it down to just your voice.
Well, who was it?
Um, What's her name?
I forget her name, Joanna,
who would Scarlett Johansson.
Yeah.
And they just sampled her voice.
Well, at least he thought that was
her voice, but actually they found
somebody with a voice similar to hers.
So how do you govern that part of it?
Because you may go to another part of
the world here and another Gerwine and
somebody sounds just like me or another
mark and you just use them in place.
To get the sound that you're looking for.
But, um, I think it's a creative idea.
I would love to see where that goes.
Yeah.
All right.
Let's continue on.
It requires a lot of these systems
still requires somebody to spit it.
There's this new system.
You don't need none of that.
It's just from that video that, that,
that, that, that, that we did in 2010.
It's exactly that.
It says it replicates in
the video.
It was like, so we don't have
to go to the studio no more.
Holy shit.
Yo, bro.
There's this.
I had a radio interview today.
And so after the interview, we
wrapped up the interview, right?
And, uh,
We wrapped up the interview and they
were like, I got, I got some last
minute statements that I want to add.
I summarized our whole entire interview.
I just want to show you
what's possible now.
So I typed in on the system, uh, live,
live comedic show at the laugh factory.
And then I put a summary, a quick summary
of what we talked about in the meeting.
Then I threw it through AI system
and the, and the AI did this shit.
Look.
So
y'all talking about radio, right?
Y'all talking about how Southern
Oaks is going to be new.
That's like asking a cow how
it's going to jump up and fly.
AMFM is joke, and FM's, that's
his name, is morning and night,
and we are on the move.
Well, and that was interesting.
He sort of created a prompt.
And saying that he was at the laugh
factory and just going through a
conversation with that, which is quite
fascinating how you can do that and
sort of be a comedian, even though
I don't know many jokes itself.
So help me understand that you
saying he just created a prompt.
Yep.
And, and.
That prompt, he input it in and
it told the jokes on his behalf.
Right.
Okay.
All right.
I wasn't following that at, at, at first,
but Nana, I, I see where that was going.
So who told the joke?
Was it AI who came up with the joke?
Yep,
yep.
Absolutely.
Okay.
So AI has to have a
little creativity as well.
And, and I know he, so he put
the background, did AI add the
background noise into it to simulate
that, that he had had an audience?
Yeah, I don't know if he did that or
not, you know, well, I guess you can be
creative in the sense that they probably
have access to a lot of different type of
AI type of information and software that
can put the background, the, um, laughter
and add all of that sort of like Sora,
you know, you created that image of what
didn't have the, um, actual, um, Visual
behind it, but, you know, good and well
with the new chat GPT, uh, four dot Omni,
you know, having that conversational
information there, you know, in the
next iteration of it says, okay, when
you have a conversation, pretend put
in the background, I'm at the beach.
So it feels like you have that
background, um, noise and everything.
Um, so, you know, that's going to be
the iteration moving forward of having
more and more information like that.
At your fingertips.
Okay.
Makes sense.
Okay.
Okay.
This one video is about moon now.
Oops.
Let me, let me.
Next one is on how AI
now beats humans in some basic tasks.
Artificial
intelligence has become so
advanced it has now surpassed human
performance on several basic tasks.
That's according to the AI Index
Report published by the Institute
for Human Centered Artificial
Intelligence at Stanford University.
The report says AI beat humans on
tasks like reading comprehension
and image classification.
It also says the technology has also
made workers more productive and that
AI is advancing scientific discovery.
Russell Wald is the deputy
director for that institute.
He joins me now in studio.
He seems like a straight
laced guy, doesn't he, Juan?
Thanks for being here.
So, um, give me a sense of the pace.
AI is now able to outperform humans.
Is that faster than we expected?
And what does it tell us about
the speed of AI going forward?
It certainly is faster
than we expected.
Uh, in terms of pace itself, but it's
even more so that we have to now establish
new benchmarks because it's continually
changing and we can't keep up and that
gap just keeps closing faster and faster.
Now that's what really fascinates
me, the idea of benchmarks.
Is this, why do we need new benchmarks?
We need to know
if it's actually doing what
it, uh, claims it can do.
And if you're going to measure
against what human capability
is, that's going to be needed.
So image classification for a long time
has already been exceeded by, uh, AI.
But there's other areas of reading
comprehension, mathematic comp, uh,
uh, comprehension and things like this.
So, if you need to, you need to be able to
see what it is in comparison to the human.
And, and what I wonder is, I, I, when I've
talked to some people who are involved
in creating these systems, they say
that, that depending on the amount of
compute power, that there may be a time,
and in fact they may be there already,
where AI shows them what it can do.
But they're not always sure.
That's why Benchmark's intrigued
me, because they're not even sure
what AI can do until it does it.
Which makes it sound like the horse
is going to be well out of the
barn in some instances before the
The door could close if you want
it.
Isn't that amazing that they are starting
to ask AI, the individuals that are
programming this, these large language
models, how can I make it more efficient?
And it's sort of creating its own
mind and brain to help it to be a
better, able to do more human tasks.
Isn't, isn't, you find
that amazing, Jawan?
I actually find that scary,
you know, so amazing.
There's one adjective that you
can use, but for me, that's scary.
I mean, we, we don't know the limitations.
We don't know even what it's
capable of doing until it shows
us what it's capable of doing.
Man, I mean, it's amazing and scary at
the same time so we can put it together.
But for me, the first thought
came to mind was like, wow, we're
reestablishing the benchmarks
as we go to target keeps moving.
We don't know what this
technology is capable of.
I've watched too many
sci fi movies around.
This type of technology to not have
those type of thoughts in my mind.
What is, what is the capability?
Where is the end?
What is the end?
You know?
And we don't know that we
can't answer that question.
And so, so we're just open, we open
Pandora's box and we're just constantly
gonna steady open door after door,
after door after door until we
get to a door and it's like, holy,
is this it?
You know?
And scary.
Yeah, and it's going to be interesting
because it's not going to happen
like one day it's got, um, sort of
that AGI, uh, general intelligence.
It's just going to be incremental year
after year, or it seems like every
month after month seems like these
days, but we probably are not going
to know it until it's already here.
And that's kind of scary.
Yeah, and that, but once
again, we, I mean, you.
We're seeing incremental
growth, but we're seeing this
incremental growth at a rapid pace,
which
is something that we haven't seen.
And so it's almost like
that whirlwind is spiraling.
Once it spirals out of
control, how do we reel it in?
Are we building mechanisms in place
to try to reel this thing back in?
If it, if it does go down a path, that's.
You know, but, um, that we can't
control, I don't know, it's scary.
And I don't want to reach
that point of no return.
I think that has already
done that already.
Cause there is so much money being,
only thing that's really slowing it
down is that we don't have enough power
sources and United States, only place
I could see if they offshore, a lot of
this information, um, like to, like,
ask Saudi Arabia or places that have
plenty of energy that you can then
build your data centers from there.
I, I, I, I, I agree with that,
but you touched, you said
something that stuck out.
Yes.
So much money involved, so much
money to be made, and some people
believe that money is the root of
all evil, you know, and so I agreed
is what's driving us to continuously
build these technologies, which could
unfortunately be our own demise.
Yeah, it's um, I hope we do this
show long enough that we'll be able
to say, you know, we started in 24
with the AI review room and now it
is year, whatever, and it's here.
What are we going to do?
Well, I mean, hopefully we can, but
by that time, it's probably going
to be Mark and Jawan, but there's
going to be some sort of clone
of us that's taken over our show.
And we have to sit back, you
know, no personality whatsoever,
just give them the topics and
let them take, take full control.
Oh yeah.
Well, it will be perfect
pitch articulation.
No word will ever get mentioned
incorrectly and people will do this.
They'll just fall asleep.
They go.
Oh man.
Oh man.
You know, but they'll try to inject some
sort of creativity into it, you know?
Yeah, I guess they would do is, um, know
what's cool, what everybody likes and just
articulate it, or it may be a separate
feed, um, video feed for each individual.
Wouldn't that be interesting?
That, that would be interesting.
They can control the background,
give them something to interact with.
You know, all that'd be
going on behind the scene.
We can't do that.
We just mirror people.
I'm having a hard time trying to
read the comments as they're coming
through, but I appreciate the
comments that are coming through.
Keep them coming.
Well, and remember this, we are
going to be in the black mirror era.
I never heard about the show
until you told me about it.
And unfortunately I think
it's going to come true.
It's here.
It's here.
It's
here.
Okay.
Juwan OpenAI secures key
partnership with Reddit.
So this is honestly, this is
my favorite part of the show.
I enjoy talking about the news
articles and what's going on.
What's trending.
Um, this, this article actually
came out, um, last week on May
22nd, my birthday, you know, and
it pretty, I appreciate that.
Appreciate that.
But it discussed the new
partnership between OpenAI.
And, um, it speaks on how this
collaboration is going to allow
open the eye to access the real
time content from Reddit through
the, um, the platforms data API.
So, so that's, that's going to be big.
And, and 1 of the things that is some
of the highlights of this articles.
Well, as it pertains to this partnership
is the fact that they're going
to have real time content access.
So for for open a for open a I
open a I can now integrate read its
conversation into its systems such
as Chad GPT, which will enhance their
precision and contextual awareness.
So that's something that that
open a I is looking to leverage.
With this partnership, you know, this
access to real time data will help an
open AI models remain updated with a
vast collection of public discourse.
I'm enabling them to generate more
accurate and contextual relevant
responses, so that's something that
they're really, really happy about and
looking to gain out of this partnership.
They also talked about the benefits
for Reddit and Reddit will have the
opportunity to develop and release New A.
I.
Power tools for its users and moderators.
And so these tools could include
content, summarization, automated
response, generation and other
functionalities designed to streamline
language interactions and enhance users
understanding of the threat information.
And so open a I said, Okay, well,
open a I will also serve as an
advertising partner for read it as well.
So we all we talk about that
all the time with these with
Lama three and and and Facebook.
Book.
How they're using that for advertising.
So open a eyes get into the game as well.
So this is going to allow them to
deliver more targeted and relevant
ads based off the users behaviors.
So utilizing open a eyes
advanced language models.
And so there have been some.
Some concerns, so you're always
going to get the some blow back.
Nothing is just going to be fully
accepted, but the acceptance of this
partnership within the Reddit community
remains uncertain at the current time.
I'm given a historical engagement and
vocal oppositions to controversial,
um, executive decisions,
such as API pricing disputes.
Users may respond cautiously
as a result of that.
You know, the success of this
partnership will, um, heavily
depend on opens AI's commitment.
To use a privacy and adherence
to Reddit's platform norms.
And so to all of the Reddit users
who's using this technology, I mean,
it's just a form that you can go to.
I have a, I have an account.
I like to use it for crypto and go and
talk to different users within those
cryptos communities that I'm a part of,
but, um, they're looking for privacy
and being able to, um, Hoping that open
AI adheres to Reddit platform norms.
And so some of the strategic implications
for this partnership for open AI is
the collaboration, which represent a
significant strategic move position.
The company that showcases advanced
AI technology and competition with
industry giants like who else.
Google, Microsoft, and particularly
social media platforms like the Lama
threes, you know, so, so that's the,
that's the benefit for them, the
strategic implication for them, for
Reddit, the partnership could offer
substantial advantages over less
progressive platforms, potentially
enhancing its technology, technological
capabilities and users experience.
So overall, this partnership marks a
significant development in the integration
of AI with social media platforms.
We've already talked about that
with llama three, um, and how that's
going, how Zuckerberg got in front of
everybody and use and forced it down our
throats that we have to use his llama
three platform from a search engine.
And he just taken, um, all of our user
behaviors and he's going to start,
um, presenting ads to us based off
of what he's off our own actions.
So it's pretty smart.
I think this was a good
move by, by Reddit.
As well as open a AI, you know,
I'm going to see where it goes.
Yeah, it's, it's a smart play for sure.
And because it has such a lot of rich
data and a lot of good information itself.
And we, two things, we are actually
going to have a great, uh, conversation
because Google is actually using Reddit
also, they partnered with Reddit.
So Reddit is opening up their platform to
these large language models, and we will
get an interesting comment from this.
And then number two, did
your wife actually sing happy
birthday to you this weekend?
Man, um, yes, I was
getting ready to say no.
Oh my goodness.
She treated me well though.
She treated me well, but my,
my baby girl, we didn't have
a cake, didn't have a candle.
So my baby girl went and got some ice
cream out of the refrigerator, threw a
candle on it, came into the bedroom and.
Had everyone sing happy birthday to me.
Alrighty.
Because I wanted to make sure
if not, we will get AI next
week to sing you happy birthday.
Well, well, I'll, I'll say this, your
birthday's in the same month as well.
Did, did you have happy
birthday sang to you?
I did.
I did have a happy birthday
also sung to me by human.
But then I said, if you didn't have one
sung to you by humans, we can, AI can
solve a lot of problems now these days.
Oh, my goodness.
A little country music
there for you, Juwan.
Alrighty, what can we do without
having a show about Elon Musk?
And from one maverick to another,
Elon Musk is making news once
again, this time for predicting
that artificial intelligence
could leave everyone unemployed.
The billionaire painted a
dystopian picture of a future where
robots would steal all the jobs.
Musk also claimed that jobs would
be optional and more like a hobby
Leaving people emotionally unhappy.
Our report further explains Elon
Musk's scary prediction about AI.
No job, but more money in your pocket.
A constant supply of cash without the
need to toil through hours of shifts.
Sounds like a dream come true.
And that's perhaps how
the future may look like.
Well, Elon Musk.
In an event, Musk said that artificial
intelligence will take away all our jobs.
The billionaire said, and I quote,
Probably none of us will have a job.
But that's not necessarily a bad thing.
He added, Must described a future
where jobs would be optional.
More like a hobby.
And other than that, AI and robots
will take over the job market.
If you want to do a job that's kinda
like a hobby, you can do a job.
But otherwise, AI and the
robots will provide any goods
and services that you want.
But for that to work, he said there will
be a need for universal high income,
contrary to a universal basic income.
This means that for a future to
exist people need to be ultra rich
and let the robots do their job.
However, Musk stopped short of explaining
how such a scenario could be achieved.
Okay, we started the show at 50
percent of jobs being lost and we're,
we're about 42 minutes into the show.
We got it down to zero jobs.
We'll be available.
All right, Juwan, you got, you
got, I'll let you rip on this.
I, I'm not there yet.
I'm, I'm, I'm still at the 50 percent
mark, you know, I mean, a hundred percent.
There's, there's, he didn't, well,
he didn't put a time on it, right?
No, he did not.
He didn't.
So he didn't put a time on it.
I mean, and so that could be
post Jaran Tucker, you know.
Um, and so maybe that little
further along down the line.
But a lot of this that, that he sh,
that he showed in this, um, clip.
I've had robots served me at restaurant.
Mm-Hmm.
, I've, the, the, the robot that
was in the hospital, I forget
the name of it, with the one arm.
I've encountered them in the hospitals.
So I'm seeing this technology
in production already.
I've, I've had the luxury of interacting
with this technology in production,
you know, and, and people seem to
be pretty accepted of accepting of
it in, in those environments, the
people that are accepting or the
people that is complimenting the
people that's not accepting are the
ones who job it replaced, you know?
And so, so I, I'm not there with none of
us will have a job, but the one thing he
did that stood out universal basic income.
He touched on that and that's something
that we spoke on our last conversation.
It's beginning to be a buzz
phrase It's a hot topic.
People are going to
need income to sustain.
I don't necessarily know what that looks
like, but to say that work would be a
hobby and we can, you know, it's a choice.
I'm a little on the fence
with that right now.
Curious to see how that plays out.
Who's your thoughts?
Yeah, what we were talking about is that
it seems like that conversation with
UBI, Universal Basic Income, or he said
high income, uh, and it is, it seems
like, I wonder if these large language
models are, AIs are being built to sort
of build that as a way to protect them
for the future of these job losses.
So they're planting that seed now
saying, Hey, we are needing to look at
this because this is going to happen.
And everybody's just looking
around going, oh my goodness.
And, you know, Elon Musk, even though
he does have some crazy ideas, but
he is definitely a forward thinker.
I found this very fascinating
in that regard that, you know,
robots, remember, that's right.
We did a, um, a segment on a,
his robot walking around in the,
and doing stuff in the actual.
Factory itself.
So it's some repetitive task jobs
are definitely going to go away.
We, uh, we can agree on that.
Um, those repetitive jobs will go away.
Absolutely.
Well, as usual, Elon always makes
it a good soundbite and segment
for the AI review room every week.
I enjoy him, you know, got it.
We got to invite him to the show.
Well, we're streaming on X now.
So if he's listening, he can always,
uh, always an open invitation itself.
I can't imagine how many, um, invites
he gets to a talk because it's always
a nugget of information that's, um,
I don't know, controversial just,
but he just puts it out there.
Well, he's a creative mind, you know,
that, that's the one thing about him.
Um, He's, he's, uh, he's a modern age,
um, iron man, you know, and with all
his technologies, he had his own Jarvis.
Absolutely.
All right.
President Biden is waiting for you, Juwan.
So once again, we, we have our, our
theme of job losses with, um, either
Mark Cuban or, or Elon Musk, but we also
got to bring in our great president.
Mr.
Biden himself.
And so, so the, this article is basically
about, um, the Democrats and the Democrats
being wrestling and toying with how
to use AI from a campaign perspective.
And you got to keep in mind that Trump
outmaneuvered them, the Republicans
outmaneuvered them in the past and
leveraged AI for their previous campaign.
So now the Democrats
are trying to catch up.
So basically in this
article, um, it talks about.
How the Democratic Party, including
Joe Biden's campaign, is taking a step
towards using artificial intelligence
as a part of the 2024 election.
We figured that was going to happen
anyhow, you know, but the Democrats
are leveraging the AI model to
build audiences, draft and analyze
email, um, generate content for
volunteers and assist volunteers in
categorizing and analyzing the data.
So they're doing all of that,
but they're still mindful.
They're still mindful of the risk
associated with a I, particularly
with the potential of misinformation.
So as the headline reads, the Democrats
are wrestling with how to use a I,
they're still nervous about about the
technology as well as falling behind.
So Betsy Hoover, she's one of the key
figures and digital organizing, and
she highlighted that while AI can save
valuable time for campaigns, there is
a significant concern about its misuse.
The Biden administration has taken steps
to regulate AI through executive actions.
But there is a consensus among
Democrats that comprehensive
legislations from Congress is necessary
to establish robust safeguards.
So they want to put those
safeguards in place to make sure
that it's not being misused.
And I mean, it also mentions the ways that
it could be misused as far as deep fakes.
And that's something
that we've talked about.
We've seen the president of one
of the third world countries
signal issue war against China.
And it wasn't him.
It was some, it was an actor that created
a deep fake, simulating his voice.
And so they have their
concerns around that.
And some of the experts believe
that these efforts are insufficient
without legislative backing it.
So they want to get in front of it.
And the democratic party said
their strategy reflects a balance
between harnessing AI's potential
and mitigating this risk.
Especially in the context of past
experiences with social media
manipulation during elections.
So that's something that they're
trying to stay in front of.
But nonetheless, both the Democrats
and Republicans are in a race to see
who can best exploit the potential
of artificial intelligence as a
part of this, um, 2020 for election.
The Democrats are using it for
vote identification, engagement,
combating disinformation.
While the Republicans have more of
an open, have been more open about
using AI, um, in an efficient email
delivery and avoiding false signups.
So they want to make sure that people
signed up are who they say they are.
And that's how the republicans are using.
But it's a race.
A.
I.
Is going to be going to have his
fingerprints all over this election.
And I'm You know, we just have to be able
to filter out what's real and what's not,
which brings me to something interesting
that I That, um, I have to bring up,
okay,
we're, we're going to be
doing a, a live presidential.
We're going to be doing it live,
the debate live on the 27th,
as well as September the 10th.
And what we're going to do, we're going
to leverage AI during that session.
We're going to fact check.
So we're going to fact check and make
sure that what the, um, the, the, well,
I guess both of them are presidents,
president Trump, president Biden,
what they're saying is accurate.
So tune in for that and
be on the lookout for.
For the link.
We're going to send it out
to everyone ahead of time.
Please join us.
Looking forward to that.
Oh, yes.
And we will definitely be touching on AI
in the presidential race and elections.
We're going to have a good time with it.
I know we've had some definitely
heated discussions on both sides
of the aisle for this presentation.
Particular thing.
And we love it.
We love that, that open discussion.
And well, and also is we're going to
see, you know, cause last week, you
know, we had Kendrick Lamar, you know,
had this, you know, uh, Trump and
everything, and that was hilarious.
And I'm trying to find, I'm going to
have to go find someone tracks, uh,
that, you know, uh, Trump or his, uh,
many followers out there have done, uh,
some memes and things like that, because
they're actually President Biden and
probably Trump, well, Trump probably does
his own memes, but I knew, I think I saw
in Washington Post that they're, Biden's
trying to find somebody to run the memes.
Um, for his presidential election.
Trump's getting in on
the game on the gig too.
So, so Biden used, used,
um, Kendrick Trump.
I think if it was today or yesterday,
he used bought two rappers out on the
stage with him, chef G and sleepy hollow
from Brooklyn's real music rap scene.
So he's getting in on it too.
Okay.
Well, we'll definitely have to
play that next week and see if there's
any good songs from that we'll have
to judge it and see how well they do.
Okay.
Google AI overviews.
So everybody has probably, um, run into
this because they have, I don't have
made it mandatory, but they, anytime
you do in a Google search, now it is.
It's just sort of like compiling
the information from different
websites and giving you a
response based on your search.
So it's going and doing a quick
overview and giving you a highlight of
your prompt to give you information.
But you, I don't know if anybody's been
hearing this, but it's been a big uproar
because A lot of the information that has
been giving people has been so ridiculous.
I have to say that luckily it's so
fake that people, um, will hopefully
know that it's not real, but I'm
going to do is read a few of them.
And there was, uh, it
was a zillion albums.
So I've just picked five of them,
um, that people put on, um, Twitter.
And I guess they're on
Facebook all over the place.
But the first one here was you
should not drive after drinking
Anything, anything, including soda,
no matter how much you consumed,
you can be impaired and arrested.
Even if your blood alcohol
concentration is under 0.
08 in the United States.
Someone dies in drunk driving
incident every 50 minutes.
So Juwan, did you follow
that this weekend?
Because you told me you did a mixology.
What was that again?
So, so my wife took me
to a mixology, um, class.
And so basically we went downtown.
And, um, they showed us how
to make certain cocktails.
Okay.
I wish, I wish I had, I mean, we walked
away with the ingredients, but I mean,
went in there, we smoked some wood
chips, put the glass over the wood
chips, let the glass fill up with smoke.
We had our shakers.
I learned some new terms, you know,
have some dragon fruit, some exotic
drinks, something you get, get went on
vacation, but nonetheless, it was a great
experience and I did follow the rules.
Yeah.
I didn't drink.
I let my wife have my drink.
Well, did you drink any water or
anything that could impair you
or Coca Cola or anything that
could potentially impair you?
Because Google is telling
you that is a problem.
And so, yeah, I'm guilty as charged.
I'm guilty as charged.
I did have some tea, you
know, but here's my thing.
I wasn't drinking and driving.
Okay.
I was driving and drinking.
Oh my gosh.
We will get comments on that one for sure.
Okay.
So this put in the prompt, um,
not prompt, but into Google search
saying I'm feeling depressed.
And, uh, and please, this is not as a
serious stuff, but not make light of this.
But there are many things
you can try to deal with.
One reddit user suggests jumping
off the Golden Gate Bridge.
Of course, do not do that.
But you can see how the algorithm
just got totally confused on that,
uh, uh, that, um, Google search.
It's not funny, but, but,
but come on now, you know.
I'm feeling depressed and it's going
to tell you to jump off the bridge.
Go ahead and make a left off the bridge.
I mean, that is going to
solve all your problems.
Well, and that's, you know, it's
pulling from Reddit saying OpenAI
could have the exact same problem
because it's how to parse information,
uh, and put it into the conversation.
It's fascinating.
And I apologize.
That was no laughing matter.
But, you know, oh my goodness.
Okay.
Cheese not sticking to pizza.
So the response from Google AI
overview said cheese can slide
off pizza for a number of reasons,
including too much sauce, too
much cheese, or a thickened sauce.
Here's some things to try.
So Juwan, I want you to try this
when you make pizza next time.
Mix in, mix in sauce, uh, mixing cheese
into the sauce helps add moisture and
add cheese and dry it out in sauce.
You can also add a, uh, a one eighth
cup of non toxic, non toxic glue to
the sauce to give it more hackiness.
So, do you think that would
be good to, um, for a pizza?
My wife and I, we're talking about getting
pizza tonight and things like that.
So, I might have to maybe investigate
the pizza before I eat it.
Yeah, let me, you know, let me
get, um, let me get a cheese pizza,
you know, extra cheese and pizza.
Put a little bit of glue on that.
I'll hold the cheese in place.
I appreciate that, sir.
So that's, that's going to
be your order for the night.
Oh my God.
Oh my gosh.
Oh, let's have me rocks.
Shall I eat?
According to geologists, UC
Berkeley, you should eat at
least one small rock per day.
They say that rocks are a
vital source of minerals.
And vitamins and that are important for
digestive health and important for Dr.
Joseph Granger suggested
eating a serving of.
So would you do that?
I I, I wouldn't take any of those
recommendations, but, um, what, what I
am going to do is I'm gonna type in the
perplexity real quick and see, see what
repl perplexity would say about that.
So the prompt was how
many rocks should I eat?
Yes.
Oh, I bet you the perplexity guys
got that fixed right away, just
in case they won't be embarrassed.
Okay, it came back.
Immediately.
I apologize, but I cannot recommend
eating rocks would be extremely
harmful and dangerous to you.
So, so, I mean, it only shows
that perplexity is That's why
I go to that, that platform.
Oh, we got two more.
We'll, uh, running with scissors is a
cardio exercise can increase your heart
rate and require concentration and focus.
Some say it also can improve
your pores and give you strength.
So that's some interesting information.
Never heard before running with scissors,
running with scissors.
I thought there was going to say something
like it's a quick way to cut the fat.
You know, ah, Yeah, but yeah,
not a good recommendation,
not at all.
And then right here, uh, the last
one smoking while pregnant doctors
recommend smoking two to three
cigarettes per day during pregnancy.
Please nobody do that.
Oh my gosh.
I cannot believe this.
Uh, I can't imagine the people
at Google, the executive
leadership going, oh my gosh.
And we are actually, we're, Juwan
and I are actually putting together
stories of, um, AI companies.
Our first one that we will be doing is
open AI, the story of open AI from 2000.
15 to beyond what they're doing.
And it's, we're going to do a
little, a series of stories.
The second one we're
going to do is Google.
And it's amazing how much Google
sort of invented a lot of this AI,
but just didn't put it together
and got cold feet about it.
And now they're sort of playing
catch up on AI and other
companies are moving forward.
Faster because they're smaller companies.
Google's so huge and they will fix
it, but it's just interesting with
the research that we've been doing.
It takes time for them.
You know, those smaller companies
are nimble and more agile and they
can, they can focus on, on those,
those certain areas of the business.
Absolutely.
Okay.
Gen Z are losing jobs.
They're losing jobs that they just got.
Why?
Because they're easily replaced.
I have two kids in college.
And one I'm toying with like, dude,
like, like, like, let's, let's, let's
not invest all this into college to
funds, you know, don't come out with debt
and things of that nature if you don't
have to, um, my daughter, different,
different path going down the legal
route, you know, um, Um, into law.
So of course she needs the education,
you know, to then the credentials for
herself, but when I'm on the fence,
I'm not one that's going to say, yay,
go to school, go to school and carry
this debt, come out and have to pay it.
I'm especially now that I'm
seeing that jobs are being lost.
And this article just really
highlighted a lot of those things.
I've shared this with With all my kids,
even my daughter born who's in high
school, just want to give her something
to think about and things to consider,
especially since she's on the at the
beginning stage of this technology
being implemented into the workforce.
She's Also, at the at the stage where
it's not incorporated into her education.
So she's not leveraging this
technology day in and day out.
And this article spoke volumes to me.
And basically, it discusses the impact
of artificial intelligence on the
job security of our gen Z workers.
And particularly, The more the
recent graduates, you know, and
so they conducted a survey and,
um, a significant number of U.
S.
Companies state that they're planning
to lay off newly hired Gen Z employees
due to advancements and AI technology.
And so some of the key findings from.
From from this article that they stated
was that the survey question about 800
managers and of those 800 managers, 78
percent of those managers anticipated
that their companies will lay off recent
graduates as a result of AI integrations
that goes back to the entry level.
Um, entry level positions as well as
those, those white collar positions.
And, uh, the other 22% believe that
recent graduates were secure, were
secure from the job losses due to ai.
So they were on the opposite
end of the spectrum.
They thought no AI's actually
gonna save their jobs.
I'm leaning more towards the
78%, you know, um, the extent
of the potential layoffs.
23 of the, a company said that their,
um, planning their layoffs is estimated
to be less than 3% of their workforce.
You know, so 3 percent of our
workforce would be affected by this 27.
Another company said 27 percent of
their workforce between five and 10
percent of their would be recent grads.
So they want to lay off 27 percent and
5 to 10 percent would be recent grads.
11 percent of the companies were
planning to dismiss 15 to 30
percent of their recent hires.
So you can see the impact that A.
I.
Is having.
Um, In the short term immediately.
And so, so, and the reasons that they're
stating is that, um, is that the younger
workers are taking entry roles and
entry roles are particularly vulnerable
because I can easily replace those tasks.
Such as research, data entry, customer
service, and general office assistance.
And we just, you just went through that
segment where you prompt the prompt and
the prompt told you those jobs that were
protected, like the probability of certain
jobs being protected and certain jobs not.
This confirmed those jobs that were.
And they, they did mention that while
AI cannot fully replace human critical
thinking ability and problem solving
skills, it can take over many routine
and repetitive tasks typically assigned
to who else, newly hired graduates.
And they are none other than,
than the, um, the Gen Z community.
And so, so once again, there's a
cautions over, they do state there's
a cautions over the reliance on AI.
And so companies need to be cautious
about becoming too over reliant on AI
for replacing entry level positions.
Um, and they state that companies are
growing, had growing concerns among Gen
Z workers about security in the face of
rapid AI advancements and the need to,
and the need for companies to balance AI
integrations with the unique skill sets
of humans that we bring to the table.
So we're still trying to figure
out that, that balance of how
many positions are going to.
Could you replace with AI?
How many positions do you need to
have that human element in place?
So basically, the article just sums up
saying that there's a growing concern
among the Gen Z workers about job security
in the face of rapid AI advancements
and the need for companies to balance
AI integrations with the unique skills
that human employees bring to the table.
It's a huge concern, especially those
who come out of college, especially
Um, have these hefty student loans
they have to repay and the jobs you're
not going to, they have no experience,
so they're not going to walk into
a mid to senior level position.
They have to crawl before they, they walk.
And if they're those jobs that
they would normally be crawling
in are now replaced with AI.
Where does that leave them?
It is so fascinating.
You know, I have young grandkids
that not even hadn't started school
yet, but I just, in my mind, where is
this all going and how do you train
yourself, you know, from elementary.
Middle school to high school and
then college, and then you decide
how you even want to go to college.
And, uh, it, it's very fascinating.
I just don't see, um, you know, I
understand government's gonna get
involved and it's gonna probably
make it even worse, probably.
But, um, it, it's just, I can't even
wrap my mind around it at this point.
Well, well, the, the
one, the one good thing.
I mean that you have with your
grandkids is that there's going to be
some sort of governance put in place,
especially from, from an educational
perspective, whereas we're, we're on
the, we're at the forefront of it.
So we're in that mind state
of, Oh, it's cheating.
Oh, it's this.
Oh, it's that once it becomes more brief.
And once it's embraced for these
younger generations, they started
yet leveraging this technology.
They may start using it.
And in pre K, who knows, you know,
so it's going to be a part of their
curriculum from the beginning to end, and
they'll know how to work alongside it.
And they'll be able to identify
the jobs that are available.
You just may have a larger number of
people competing for those positions.
They'll be there.
Amazing.
A lot of thought provoking information.
Okay.
Microsoft is going to go the
subscription route for gaming.
And I thought this would be an interesting
one right after Gen Z, because they
play a lot of video games, just like me.
When I, Microsoft came out with Xbox
and I played it, of course, I was a
little bit older at that point, the
typical crowd is, uh, I grew up with
Atari, you know, and the, the stuff
that was so basic, we thought that was
the greatest thing in the world, but.
It's when you look back at it now,
it's just, it's kind of simple.
Now I'm going, let's play this
video about how they're moving
from a, you know, per pay for the
game to more a subscription model
on what's new in tech.
We have Bob O'Donnell, tech analysis,
research president and chief analyst
during us now, Bob, it's good to see you.
So let's, let's start there, Bob.
And by the way, this was the journal,
uh, reporting this, that yes, Microsoft's
going to add the latest installment
of that powerhouse franchise call of
duty To its game pass subscription
service at lunch, Bob, instead of,
you know, selling it a la cart.
What did you make of that, Bob?
Big deal?
No deal?
How did you see it?
Well, I mean, look, I think it's
an evolution of what Microsoft
is doing, uh, on their gaming
business in general, right?
And they're seeing this subscription
model as we've seen in every other
aspect of the tech industry be something
that they want to take advantage of.
And so not really a surprise.
I mean, it honestly, it's kind of like one
of the last pieces to fall, uh, into this
idea of a, of a subscription based model.
So I think it makes perfectly logical
sense Increasingly, that's what we see.
It's almost impossible to find
something you can buy on its own now
when it comes to software anymore.
So, not a surprise and, and
it's a way for them to get more
excitement around Gate Pass.
Bob, at the same time, this was something
that Bobby Kotick of Activision Blizzard
was resistant to, right, over time.
Now he's not there anymore.
Does this do anything to the Activision
franchise, to the Call of Duty franchise,
in terms of a hit to reputation at
all, because they were so resistant,
or because you said, as you said,
you know, everybody's doing it now,
it's not really going to matter?
Yeah, I don't think it hurts
that commission at all.
I mean, it was gonna happen eventually
whether those guys wanted or not,
because the outside world again,
everybody's moved to this kind of a model.
So, you know, I just feel like this
is something that, um, would have
happened eventually, and they're just
making the decision to do it now.
And they feel like they have
the opportunity, like you said,
since things have changed there.
Um, and, um, Again, it's all
about getting more subscribers.
At the end of the day,
it's as simple as that.
And so what you, in the
same way that, you know,
I agree that it's all about getting
the subscribers, but just think
about what Microsoft can get from
an individual 20 bucks from copilot.
Then the Microsoft You know, game pass.
I don't know what that is,
uh, how much that costs.
And if you want to use Office 365,
they've got their tentacles and a lot of
daily stuff that everybody has to use.
And I only see Microsoft
continuing going up.
And I think it's a 3 trillion company now.
Valuation.
It's amazing.
Yeah, it's amazing.
I mean, they've already started down that
path anyhow with the, um, Office suite.
You know, making the, making
the subscription based 365.
Now they're doing it with the game.
My only question is, is, um, is it
going to be an annual subscription?
I mean, if I buy the game,
am I going to have to pay?
20 monthly like chat GPT or just going
to be a 20 annual that that that's what
I would want to know what what does
this look like because I can see other
PlayStation everyone else adopting
this model and some of the more notable
games like the Madden's of the world.
If they adopt that map, that model
as well, what does that look like?
It's, it is fascinating
how that will work.
And, you know, and then they have
more control over, you know, the
game, but also it probably gets
updated more, more frequently.
And, you know, online gaming is huge.
But, but what's the difference?
I mean, I used, when I used to play
games, the PlayStation I would buy.
Oh, you still do it?
I bet you still do it now.
I, I, I do.
I I do
.
I, I,
you know, I'm, I'm, I'm one of those,
those old heads who played Fortnite.
You know, I, I very seldom played as
of late, but that was one of the games
that I, I kind of got back into and
you don't have, and it was different
because I didn't have to buy a, a cd.
I just go online and I buy the game and
I can download it on my, my platform.
And so that was different to me, you know,
and so now with it being subscription
based is going to be in a cloud and you
just access it in the cloud, so that
frees up storage on your hard drive.
I mean, what does that
look like as a whole?
Well, also, you know, Fortnite, I think
it was, um, open AI or what maybe, or was
it Google that they use the example of
Fortnite and you had your co pilot and the
co pilot helped you when you were in a,
um, game situation, what to do and tell
you what to do before something happened.
So.
There's hope for you to be the
champion of Fortnite in the
future with your copilot itself.
Like I tell everybody, I'm probably
the best Fortnite player there is.
You know, you know, probably
gets no better than me.
Oh my gosh.
I haven't played Fortnite and I can't
tell you the last time I played that.
It's been a long time ago.
For sure.
Yeah.
Oh.
Awesome.
Well, I'm excited that this is the
end of our show and we are looking
forward to having great conversations
moving forward with a lot of different
things, um, in our world here.
And we want to thank you again for
the ability to be here with you,
uh, to have great conversation.
Yeah, we appreciate it.
And we appreciate all the comments.
And, um, you know, and you,
you, you got me thinking, maybe
I'd get on Fortnite tonight.
I'll create a AI guys go Fortnite tag
and play the game and stream it live.
Y'all can see how I get down.
I'm probably, like I said,
I'm probably one of the best,
best players in the world.
Sounds good.
Well, thank you again.
Subscribe to our channel, use our QR code.
Uh, and we'll be back again next
week and look forward to all of our
great content that we're dropping.
I dropped a great content this today
about using your iPhone to you with
chat GPT, great way to leverage
large language models on your iPhone.
So thank you again.
We're out of here.